Collection of Best Practices in Inclusive EFL
By Mariana Karatsiori
This collection is a collaborative work across five European institutions: the University of Macedonia (Greece), the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Greece), Catholic University of Lublin (Poland), University of Ljubljana (Slovenia), and University of Education Heidelberg (Germany). Each institution contributed expertise in specific areas of inclusive education, while international contributors from Dublin City University and Herzen University in St. Petersburg added valuable global perspectives.
The practices emerged from a comprehensive literature review of European policies and successful initiatives, combined with direct needs analysis interviews with students with diverse learning needs. These weren’t developed in isolation—they represent tested, refined approaches that teachers have successfully implemented in actual classrooms.
The collection organizes practices across four main learning support focuses: Visual and Sensory Support (practices 1-6), Attention and Focus Support (practices 7-11), Reading and Processing Support (practices 12-17), and Communication Support for Deaf and Hard of Hearing learners (practices 18-23). Each practice is aligned with specific CEFR levels from A1 to B2/C1, ensuring you can find developmentally appropriate strategies regardless of your students’ current proficiency levels.
This guide will help you understand the collection’s structure, navigate its resources effectively, and implement these practices in ways that work for your specific classroom context. Most importantly, it will show you how Universal Design for Learning principles embedded in these practices benefit not just students with identified needs, but all learners in your classroom.
By the end of this module, you will be able to:
- Navigate the collection effectively to find practices matching your students’ needs, CEFR levels, and language skills focus, understanding how the organizational structure supports practical implementation.
- Understand the research and student feedback foundation underlying each practice, recognizing how evidence-based approaches improve teaching effectiveness and student outcomes.
- Implement practices from the collection using the structured format provided—from objectives through materials, step-by-step procedures, assessment, and suggested variations.
- Adapt practices to your specific classroom context, understanding how to modify activities while maintaining their core inclusive design principles and learning objectives.
- Apply Universal Design for Learning checkpoints included with each practice to ensure your implementation benefits all students, not just those with identified needs.
The SPLENDID Collection of Best Practices rests on several interconnected theoretical foundations that together create a comprehensive approach to inclusive language education.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Every practice in the collection incorporates UDL principles, which means they’re designed from the outset to be accessible to diverse learners rather than retrofitted with accommodations. The practices provide multiple means of engagement (connecting to varied interests and motivations), multiple means of representation (presenting information through different modalities), and multiple means of action and expression (allowing students to demonstrate learning in various ways).
Critically, each practice includes specific UDL checkpoints that help you implement these principles consistently. For instance, “Feel the Sounds” (Practice 1) provides tactile representations of phonics concepts while also offering visual and auditory support, ensuring that students can access phonological awareness through their strongest learning channels. This isn’t just good for students with visual impairments—it benefits all learners by providing cognitive redundancy and reinforcement.
CEFR Framework Integration
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages provides the collection’s structural backbone, ensuring practices maintain rigorous language learning objectives while incorporating accessibility features. Each practice clearly indicates target CEFR levels (A1, A2, B1, B2, or B2/C1). This alignment ensures that inclusive practices don’t compromise academic standards but rather provide alternative pathways to achieving the same competency levels.
Student-Centered Design
The collection emerged from extensive needs analysis interviews with students with diverse learning needs, conducted as part of the SPLENDID project’s T2.2 activity. Students described what helped them learn, what frustrated them, and what accommodations made genuine differences in their language acquisition. This authentic student voice pervades the practices.
For example, practices for students with ADHD emphasize clear visual structure, movement integration, and manageable task chunks—all based on students’ reported experiences of what helped them maintain focus and engagement. Practices for students with dyslexia incorporate multisensory phonics approaches and memory strategies that students identified as effective. The collection doesn’t just theorize about student needs—it responds to actual student experiences.
Research-Informed Practice
Each practice builds on established research in inclusive education, special education, and second language acquisition. The collection synthesizes findings from European policy documents, successful international projects, and peer-reviewed academic research. References to established methodologies—such as multisensory structured literacy for dyslexia or visual-gestural communication for deaf learners—ground the practices in evidence-based approaches. At the same time, the collection acknowledges that classroom implementation always requires teacher judgment and contextual adaptation, which is why each practice includes variation suggestions and adaptation guidance.
Let’s explore how the collection works in practice by examining representative examples from each learning support focus area.
Visual and Sensory Support (Practices 1-6)
These practices address the needs of students with visual impairments, from partial sight to complete blindness, while simultaneously enriching multisensory learning for all students.
Example: “Feel the Sounds” (Practice 1, Level B1)
This practice, developed by Anna Zourna and Marianthi Karatsiori, transforms abstract phonics concepts into concrete tactile experiences. Students explore phonemes through touch, using textured materials to distinguish between different sound categories—rough surfaces for harsh consonants, smooth for soft ones, ribbed textures for fricatives. The practice includes detailed material lists (various textured fabrics, sandpaper, corrugated cardboard), step-by-step procedures for introducing tactile-sound associations, and assessment strategies that don’t rely on visual recognition.
Why it works: The practice provides redundant sensory input—students hear phonemes, feel textures associated with them, and produce the sounds themselves. This multisensory approach strengthens neural connections for all learners, not just those with visual impairments. The UDL checkpoints remind teachers to provide options for perception, language and symbols, and comprehension—ensuring accessibility throughout the activity.
Example: “Rainforest Wonders” (Practice 3, Level A1-A2)
This practice uses a rainforest theme to teach vocabulary and descriptive language through multisensory experiences. Students interact with natural materials—bark, leaves, soil—while learning associated vocabulary. The practice includes adaptations for different visual abilities, from using high-contrast images for students with low vision to providing fully tactile alternatives for blind students. Audio descriptions accompany all visual elements, and students can access content through their preferred sensory channels.
Attention and Focus Support (Practices 7-11)
These practices specifically address ADHD and attention difficulties while incorporating strategies that enhance engagement and focus for all learners.
Example: “Visual Aids for Students with ADHD” (Practice 7, Level A2+/B1)
Developed by Karin Vogt, this practice provides explicit structure through visual organizational tools—color-coded task cards, visual schedules, graphic organizers, and step-by-step procedure charts. The practice recognizes that students with ADHD benefit from external structure when internal regulation is challenging. Materials include templates for various visual aids, guidance on color selection for maximum effectiveness, and strategies for gradually fading supports as students develop independence.
Why it works: Visual structure reduces cognitive load by making expectations explicit and tasks manageable. The practice includes movement breaks and kinesthetic elements because research and student feedback both confirm that physical activity supports sustained attention. The detailed implementation guidance helps teachers maintain consistency, which students with ADHD particularly need.
Example: “Vocabulary Practice Through Interactive Ball Game” (Practice 9, Level A1)
This practice combines vocabulary practice with gross motor movement, recognizing that kinesthetic learning supports both motor development and attention maintenance. Students toss a ball while practicing vocabulary, with variations for different physical abilities—using softer balls, adjusting distances, allowing rolling instead of throwing. The practice demonstrates how a simple activity can be designed to accommodate diverse physical and attention needs simultaneously.
Reading and Processing Support (Practices 12-17)
These practices address dyslexia and reading difficulties through evidence-based multisensory structured literacy approaches.
Example: “Phonics and Spelling Boost” (Practice 13, Level A1-A2)
This practice, drawing from Joanna Nijakowska’s work and adapted by the University of Ljubljana team, provides systematic, explicit phonics instruction using multisensory techniques. Students simultaneously see letter patterns, hear corresponding sounds, say the sounds aloud, and write the letters—engaging visual, auditory, kinesthetic, and tactile pathways simultaneously. The practice includes detailed scope and sequence for introducing phoneme-grapheme correspondences, guidance for pacing instruction to student needs, and cumulative review strategies that strengthen long-term retention.
Why it works: Research consistently demonstrates that students with dyslexia need explicit, systematic phonics instruction. The multisensory approach strengthens neural pathways through redundancy—if one pathway is weak, others compensate. The practice includes metacognitive elements, teaching students to monitor their own decoding and self-correct, which builds independence over time.
Example: “Self-Monitoring Word Reading” (Practice 15)
This practice teaches students explicit strategies for monitoring their own reading accuracy and comprehension. Students learn to pause after reading passages, ask themselves whether what they read made sense, and employ fix-up strategies when meaning breaks down. The practice includes self-assessment checklists, error tracking sheets that help students identify patterns in their difficulties, and graduated guidance for developing independent monitoring skills.
Communication Support for Deaf and Hard of Hearing (Practices 18-23)
These practices, developed by the Catholic University of Lublin team, address the unique communication and literacy needs of deaf and hard of hearing English learners.
Example: “Read My Lips” (Practice 18)
This comprehensive practice teaches speechreading skills (commonly called lipreading) as part of foreign language instruction. It acknowledges that many deaf and hard of hearing students rely partially on visual speech information and provides explicit instruction in this skill rather than assuming students will develop it naturally. The practice includes exercises for recognizing phonemes visually, distinguishing minimal pairs through speechreading, and integrating speechreading with other literacy skills.
Why it works: The practice recognizes that speechreading is a learned skill requiring explicit instruction and practice. It provides systematic progression from easier distinctions to more challenging ones, includes frequent practice opportunities, and integrates speechreading with written language and sign language support. The practice acknowledges limitations—not all speech sounds are visually distinct—and provides alternative strategies when visual information is insufficient.
See the practice in action: A detailed PowerPoint presentation demonstrating the implementation of “Read My Lips” is available in the collection materials. This presentation walks through the 14-step methodology, showing how to build student awareness about auditory impairments, develop empathy through experiential learning activities, introduce the International Phonetic Alphabet, and culminate in practical communication strategies that help students become better communicators for lip-readers.
Example: “Enhancing Oral Communication with Subtitled Videos” (Practice 20)
This practice systematically uses captioned video content to support listening comprehension and vocabulary development. It provides specific guidance on selecting appropriate videos, pre-teaching vocabulary, using caption controls effectively, and designing comprehension activities that leverage both audio and text channels. The practice includes strategies for gradually fading subtitle support as students develop greater independence.
Take time to consider how this collection might transform your teaching practice.
About Your Current Practices
Think about a lesson you taught recently. How many different ways did students access information—through reading, listening, seeing, touching? How many different ways could students demonstrate what they learned? If you have students with diverse learning needs, do you design lessons that are accessible from the start, or do you retrofit accommodations afterward?
About the Collection
As you browse the collection, which practices immediately seem relevant to your students? Which practices address needs you’ve observed but haven’t known how to support? Are there practices designed for specific disability categories that might benefit other students in your classroom?
About Implementation
Consider one practice you’d like to try. What materials do you already have? What would you need to acquire or create? How might you modify the practice for your specific context—your students’ ages, proficiency levels, interests, and needs? What concerns or questions do you have about implementation?
About Your Learning
What did you learn from the collection that surprised you? Which practices challenged your assumptions about what’s possible for students with specific needs? How might the UDL principles embedded in these practices change your approach to lesson planning for all students?
The Complete Collection
SPLENDID Deliverable D2.3: Collection of Best Practices in EFL per Disability & CEFR Level
Karatsiori, M., Liontou, T., Domagała-Zyśk, E., Vogt, K., Košak Babuder, M., Javornik, K., Poredoš, M., & Pižorn, K. (2024). SPLENDID D2.3 Report: Collection of Best Practices in EFL per Disability & CEFR Level (M. Karatsiori & T. Liontou, Eds.). Supporting foreign Language lEarNing for stuDents wIth Disabilities (SPLENDID) Project, Grant Agreement No. 2022-1-EL01-KA220-SCH-000089364. Erasmus+ Programme.
Related SPLENDID Resources
T2.1 Literature Review: The research foundation underlying the best practices collection, reviewing European policies, existing projects, and academic research on inclusive language education.
T2.2 Needs Analysis: Direct student voices describing what helps and hinders their language learning, providing the user-centered foundation for practice development.
WP3 Educational Video Game: Interactive digital tool incorporating many of the principles from the best practices collection.
WP4 Teachers’ Handbook: Expanded educational scenarios building on the best practices, with additional implementation guidance and classroom integration strategies.
Universal Design for Learning
CAST (2024). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines Version 3.0. Retrieved from https://udlguidelines.cast.org
Specialized Resources by Disability Category
For Visual Impairments: Perkins School for the Blind resources on accessible education; National Federation of the Blind materials on teaching students with visual impairments.
For ADHD: CHADD (Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) educator resources; ADDitude Magazine teaching strategies.
For Dyslexia: International Dyslexia Association resources; Orton-Gillingham approach materials; Wilson Reading System guidance.
For Deaf/Hard of Hearing: National Association of the Deaf education resources; Laurent Clerc National Deaf Education Center materials; Described and Captioned Media Program.
Selected Academic References
Nijakowska, J., Tsagari, D., & Spanoudis, G. (Eds.). (2018). Dyslexia and Foreign Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Domagała-Zyśk, E. (Ed.). (2016). English as a Foreign Language for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Persons: Challenges and Strategies. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
